PlayNow, OLG, Loto-Québec

What your own province sells you, and what it withholds

Every Canadian province runs a gambling site of its own, and a reader choosing between it and an international operator is trading recourse against range; what each provincial corporation offers, in its own terms.

Ad disclosure: the operator links on this page are affiliate links, and we are paid when a reader opens an account. It does not change which operators are listed, and it does not change the order, which is by licensing authority and then alphabetical. We publish no ratings and no bonus amounts. 19+.

A publicly owned casino is a strange object, and it is worth looking at squarely

A provincial gambling corporation is asked to do two things that pull against each other (and it is asked to do both by the same minister), and it is asked to raise money for the province, which means selling a "product" people want more of. And it is asked to protect the people it sells to, which means selling less of it.

Everything about the way these sites look and behave comes out of that tension. And once a reader sees it he can read their choices rather than merely using them; the tension explains the things players complain about. The catalogue is smaller than an international lobby because every title has to be "approved" rather than merely licensed (a procurement decision, not a commercial one).

The "offers" are thin because a public body advertising gambling heavily is a political problem. The "table limits" are modest because a corporation that is also a harm-reduction agency does not want the largest bets in the market; none of that is incompetence, and reading it as incompetence leads a player to the wrong conclusion about what he is choosing. The same tension explains what they do unusually well.

A "deposit limit" on a provincial site is a real tool rather than a gesture, the help line in the footer is funded by the same government that put the site there (one budget, two directions). The "self-exclusion" system covers everything that government licenses at once.

The objection, stated plainly before anything else

This page sits on a site that earns money when a reader opens an account with an international operator (a commission, declared on every list), and it is about the operators we are not paid for; that makes it the page where readers should be most suspicious of us. The answer is to put the provincial sites' real advantage in the second section rather than in a footnote at the end.

Here it is. If you lose a dispute with the operators we list, your "recourse" runs to a regulator in Malta, in Alderney or in Kahnawake, and it runs in a language and a timetable that are not yours.

If you lose a dispute with your provincial corporation, it runs to a body a reader's own legislature created (a "Crown corporation", answerable upward), and in the end to a minister who answers to an assembly you vote for. That is not a small difference, and no licence on any card on this site substitutes for it.

We think there are good reasons a reader might still choose otherwise, and the rest of this page sets them out, and we would rather he chose with the first paragraph of this section in front of him.

What each one actually is

PlayNow is run by the British Columbia Lottery Corporation and serves three provinces (one platform, three jurisdictions), with Manitoba and Saskatchewan joining through "agreements" rather than running their own platforms. It is the oldest of the Canadian provincial casino sites and the most complete, and it carries "live dealer" tables, a poker room and a sportsbook alongside the slots.

Atlantic Lottery serves the four Atlantic provinces from a single platform under the same arrangement (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island), which is why a reader in Moncton and a reader in St John's see the same catalogue. OLG is Ontario's own site, and its position is unusual, because it sits beside a licensed private market rather than instead of one, so an Ontario player has both the provincial site and the operators in the "iGaming Ontario" directory available to him.

Play Alberta is the equivalent in Alberta, and its position changed in July 2026 (the month the province licensed others) when the province opened a "licensed market" around it. Loto-Québec is the only legal online gambling site in Québec according to the corporation's own words, "Au Québec, le seul site de jeux en ligne légal est lotoquebec.com", and the Québec position is set out at more length on our French page for that province!

Royal Vegas
Alderney AGCC cat. 1 · Kahnawake 00892
Open Royal Vegas
Commercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
Luxury Casino
MGA · Kahnawake · AGCO in Ontario
Open Luxury Casino
Commercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
Yukon Gold Casino
MGA · Kahnawake · AGCO in Ontario
Open Yukon Gold Casino
Commercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026

The comparison, made on the things that differ

Four differences do real work, and the rest is presentation, and the first is currency, and here the provincial sites win outright. The account is held in Canadian dollars at a Canadian institution (no "FX markup", no second rate), so a deposit of fifty dollars is fifty dollars and a withdrawal of three hundred is three hundred.

A player who moves money fourteen times in a year across a currency boundary, at something like three and a half per cent a crossing (fourteen crossings, in an ordinary year), is paying for range, and on a provincial site he pays nothing, and that is the single clearest number in this comparison. The second is recourse, covered above.

The third is "self-exclusion", and it deserves its own sentence because it is the difference players discover at the worst possible moment: a provincial "exclusion" stops every site that province licenses, and it does not stop one operator outside that set (not one).

The fourth is range, and it is the only one that runs the other way: the catalogues (the live tables), the payment methods and the limits in our index are wider, sometimes by an order of magnitude. A reader who wants the whole trade in a sentence can have it, and the provincial site is the better place to have a problem, and the international operators are the wider place to play.

A player who cares more about the first should be on his province's site, and we will not pretend otherwise merely because we are not paid for it!

What the provincial sites do not tell you either

Fairness cuts both ways, and there are two things the provincial corporations are quiet about.

The first is that their games carry a "house edge" like everybody else's (the same arithmetic, a different owner), and a publicly owned slot machine takes the same proportion of a stake as a privately owned one (the mathematics does not read the shareholder register), and public ownership changes where the money goes afterwards, not the mathematics on the way.

The second is that the revenue funds the province, which means the body warning a player about harm is also the body that benefits from his play. The corporations are open about funding public services and less open about that structural position, and it is worth a reader holding both facts at once rather than choosing whichever one suits the conclusion he already had.

Where this leaves a reader

Two accounts are not a compromise, they are two sets of decisions, and a reader who opens one on his provincial site should set the "deposit limit" while he is opening it rather than later, because that is the moment the tool is free. A reader who opens one with an operator from our index should read the licence on the card, note the authority, and should understand that the route to a complaint runs through that authority and not through his own province.

The registers, the ages and the help lines for every province are a click from here (three pages, one menu), and they are worth reading in that order: what is licensed where you are, how old a reader has to be, and who answers the telephone if the evening goes wrong.

Questions readers ask

Is the provincial site safer than an international casino?

On the one measure that matters when something goes wrong, yes: a dispute with a provincial corporation ends inside a body your own legislature controls, while a dispute with an operator licensed elsewhere ends with that regulator. On the measures a player notices in an ordinary session, the catalogues, the payment routes and the table limits, the provincial sites are the narrower product.

Can I hold accounts with both?

Nothing in any provincial statute forbids a resident from holding an account anywhere, because the prohibitions in this area are addressed to operators rather than to players; two accounts mean two sets of deposit limits to set and two self-exclusion systems that do not talk to each other, and the second of those is the one worth thinking about.

Which province has which site?

PlayNow serves British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan; Atlantic Lottery serves Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Island; OLG serves Ontario alongside the licensed private market; Loto-Québec serves Québec; Play Alberta serves Alberta alongside its licensed market. The three territories have no site of their own.

Do the provincial sites pay out in Canadian dollars?

All of them do, and it is the one point on which they are unambiguously better than a large part of our index: the account is held in the currency of the player's own bank, so there is no conversion on the way in and none on the way out.

By the Canadian Dollar Casinos editorial team · Last updated October 2026 · Online since 2012