The suppliers
The studios, where the table you sit at is actually made
A live table belongs to the studio that built it and not to the casino that shows it, so two brands with different names put a player in the same room with the same croupier. Knowing the studio tells a reader what he will find before he registers.
The same "studio", a different door?
Videoslots
MGA/CRP/258/2014 · Videoslots Limited
Landing page: the operator’s Canadian home pageLanding page named in the operator's programme link sheet, 14 October 2026. We publish no amounts.
Open VideoslotsCommercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
A table is a tenancy, not a possession
The live floor is rented. That one fact reorganises everything else on it. A casino that offers "live roulette" has signed an agreement with a studio, received a "feed" (the stream of a real table in a real room) and an interface to place bets through, then put its own colours around the edges (a logo on the felt, usually).
The studio owns the wheel, employs the "croupier", writes the rules of the "variant" and sets the limits of the table (the minimum and the maximum a seat will accept). The casino owns the account, the "balance", the currency that balance is held in and the route the money takes out, That list is the whole of the choice. It is a shorter list than most readers expect; it does not include anything at all that happens between a spin and a settlement.
We think the consequence is worth stating plainly, because the whole apparatus of lobby marketing works against it: choosing between two casinos that buy from the same studio is not choosing between two live floors (the lobby will call it "our live casino" either way). It is choosing between two accounts, which is a narrower thing and a far more checkable one. And an account, unlike a studio, can be assessed from the outside (currency, licence, province, payment route), which is what the cards on this site attempt.
How the relationships look in our files
The asset register of this site records a supplier for a brand where the brand's own material states one, with the date of the reading, and keeps the field empty where it does not (which happens more often than a reader would guess). Read on 21 October 2026, it puts Jackpot City on the Games Global "platform" with live tables from Evolution, which is the clearest of the entries we hold (platform and live studio, both named).
LuckyDays appears there as a "multi-provider" catalogue, with Evolution beside Pragmatic Play, Play'n GO, Red Tiger, Quickspin and Yggdrasil, which is the ordinary shape of a modern lobby: one live supplier, several slot suppliers, and an "aggregator" joining them (the layer that puts a hundred studios behind one feed). Videoslots carries a live casino alongside a slot library its own material puts at more than ten thousand titles from about two hundred suppliers.
For Mega Casino, Prime Casino and Spin Genie the register names the platform (SkillOnNet, with a "multi-provider" catalogue of slots and live tables from third parties) without naming the live studio, and we leave that field as the register leaves it.
Betway is the case where our files say least: the register records "Betway platform (Super Group)" and notes that no factsheet was supplied. You are entitled to know the difference between a field we filled and a field nobody filled, which is why the card shows it.
- Yes — read at the source and working as described
- Partly — it exists, with a condition that matters
- No — it does not exist, or the rules forbid it
- Not verified — we looked and could not establish it, and we say so
What travels with the table
Four things arrive with a studio's table and cannot be altered by the casino showing it, whatever the lobby copy says about its own live floor; recognising them is the practical pay-off of this page for you. The studio decides all four. The first is the variant, meaning the rules themselves: whether a blackjack table pays a "natural" at three to two or six to five, whether a roulette wheel has one green pocket or two, whether a baccarat "shoe" uses the ordinary "drawing rules".
The second is the set of "side bets" offered around the main game, which the studio builds and the casino can switch on or leave off; a "perfect pairs" or a "lightning" "multiplier" carries its own price, several times the edge of the game it sits beside, and that price is the studio's decision.
The third is the "table limits", which are set for the economics of a studio rather than for a modest balance: a croupier, a set, a camera crew and a stream that never stops have to be paid for by the table, so the minimum on a live game sits well above its machine equivalent (five dollars against twenty cents, in the ranges the trade quotes).
The fourth is the interface, and it is the one a reader notices first without knowing what he is noticing. A studio builds one betting layout and licenses it everywhere, so the layout is a fingerprint, and a reader who recognises it at a new brand already knows the variant list he is about to see!
What stays with the casino
The currency the account is held in is the casino's, and on this site it is the field that matters most (the first box on every card). A table settles in whatever the balance holds, so two readers at the identical studio table pay different prices for the evening if one of them is crossing a currency boundary twice a session (in and out) and the other is not.
The "withdrawal" route and its duration are the casino's, and they are not symmetrical with the deposit: money that went in by card frequently comes back by bank transfer, which turns an afternoon into several days (three to five, in the ranges the operators quote). Our cards carry what our files hold about this, and mark it "not verified" where the files are silent rather than filling it with a plausible range.
The provincial sites are the casino's too, and for you, reading from Canada, they are the difference between an operator that has built for this country and one that merely accepts it. Four brands in our index hold a registration with the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario through Cadtree Limited (Jackpot City, Royal Vegas, Ruby Fortune and Spin Casino), and the same four appear on the Alberta register, each on a separate site from the international one.
Those are the fields a reader can check before he registers, and they are the reasons to prefer one door over another into the same room.
Mega Casino
MGA/CRP/171/2009/01 · Skill On Net Limited
Open Mega CasinoCommercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
Prime Casino
MGA/CRP/171/2009/01 · Skill On Net Limited
Open Prime CasinoCommercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
Lucky Nugget
Alderney AGCC cat. 1 · Kahnawake 00892
Open Lucky NuggetCommercial link · 19+ (18+ in AB, MB, QC) · operator’s terms apply · checked 21.10.2026
The question this page is really answering
A reader arriving at a comparison site usually wants to know which casino has the better live floor, and the honest answer is that the question has been put to the wrong party. The floor belongs to a studio, the studio sells to everybody, and a casino's influence over it is a choice of which products to switch on.
So the question worth asking instead is which account suits the reader: held in his own currency, reachable by a payment method that works both ways, under an authority whose register he can read, and in his province if his province has built one. That is a shorter question, and unlike the first one it has an answer a reader can verify himself.
We would rather hand a reader that reframing than a ranking of live floors we are not in a position to produce. It is less satisfying to read, and it is the one of the two that survives contact with the facts!
What we could not establish
Nobody here has sat at a live table, and no account was opened to look at one; there is no sentence anywhere on this site claiming otherwise. The Games Global brands answer a request from outside Canada with a refusal (an HTTP "403"), so their lobbies could not be opened from this desk at all.
The table lists, the minimum stakes and the side bets available at each brand therefore come from the operators' own material and from our asset register, with the date of the reading, rather than from a screen. Where a supplier is not named in those sources, we do not name one.
What remains is a structural fact that does not go stale and that a reader can verify himself the next time he recognises an interface: the table is the studio's, the account is the casino's, and only the second of the two is worth comparing.
Questions readers ask
How can I tell which studio a table comes from?
The name is usually written into the table itself, in the panel or along the felt, and the interface is a stronger clue than the name: a studio builds one interface and licenses it to every casino it supplies, so a layout a reader recognises at one brand is the same supplier at the next.
Does it matter to me who makes the table?
It tells you the rules before you look at them, which is the practical value. The variants, the side bets, the limits and the "information panel" arrive with the table, so a reader who liked a particular blackjack table at one brand will find the identical table at every other brand buying from the same studio.
Are "exclusive" live tables really exclusive?
Usually it means a branded table inside a shared studio: the casino's name on the felt and its colours on the interface, around a game the studio also sells to everybody else. A genuinely commissioned table exists, and it is rare enough that an operator says so in detail when it has one.
Which studio is the best one?
That is not a question we can answer honestly, because nobody here has played at these tables and a judgement about a room is not something this site is in a position to sell, which is why it does not. What can be said is which studio supplies which brand, and that is in our files with the date we read it.
By the Canadian Dollar Casinos editorial team · Last updated October 2026 · Online since 2012
