About us

Who writes this site, and what changed in October 2026

A short account of what this site is for, who publishes it, what the previous version of it got wrong, and the three rules the rebuilt version is written under.

A site about a currency, which is a narrower subject than it sounds

Canadian Dollar Casinos exists to answer one question properly rather than twenty loosely (which is a narrower ambition than it sounds), and the question is which online casinos hold a player's money in his own "currency", and what it costs him when they do not. Everything else on the site follows from that: the payment pages, because "Interac e-Transfer" is the method that marks a casino built for Canada; the licence column.

Because an account held abroad is governed abroad; the provincial pages, because the law that applies is the law where the player sits (thirteen jurisdictions, two with registers). The subject came from the domain rather than the other way round (the name was there first). You who searches for casinos that take Canadian dollars is not looking for a bonus, he is looking to stop paying a "conversion" he has noticed on a statement, and that reader was not being served by anybody.

Of the sixteen Canadian comparison sites this site reads on the twentieth of October 2026, every one led with an "offer" and not one made the currency of the account a field you could compare (zero out of sixteen). So the site is organised around a fact that can be checked rather than a judgment that has to be trusted, and that principle is also the reason it carries no ratings.

What the previous version got wrong

The old site had been rebuilt more than once and showed it (several hands, one domain). Thirty-two pages carried the writing of several hands, two different measurement "containers" ran on the same site. The script that counted visitors loaded in the head of every page before the reader had been asked anything about cookies (thirty pages carried one container, two carried another).

The banner that asked offered "OK" and "Info" and treated scrolling as "agreement", which is not a choice. Underneath, the plumbing contradicted itself (and had done for years), and every "canonical" address pointed at the version of the domain with "www" while the server redirected that version to the one without it, so each page declared an address the server sent somewhere else, and there was no structured data on any page.

Twenty-seven pages carried a link to an operator the owner had stopped working with (the relationship had ended in October 2026), and one card paired a brand's name with another brand's logo, and none of that was visible to a reader, and all of it was visible to a search engine, and this site is setting it out here rather than quietly fixing it because a page that claims a method ought to be willing to describe the state it started from.

The three rules this version is written under

A "licence" appears only with its parts. The authority, the number, the company that holds it and the date this site reads it, or the card says that this site could not establish one, and there is no version of a card on this site that names an authority without saying who holds the licence!

A figure appears only with its source, and Every number in these pages carries where it was read and when, and that is why the pages are slower to write than the ones they replaced, and why the index carries a column recording what this site could not verify rather than filling those cells with something plausible.

This site publishes no ratings and no bonus amounts, and Not on any page and not for any market. A "rating" is a number you have to take on trust, and we would rather hand him the licence number and let him check it. A bonus amount is the figure in this trade that goes stale fastest, and a stale figure in a commercial communication is an inaccuracy rather than a typing error. A fourth rule is really a consequence of the first three.

This site does not write that this site has tested anything, because this site has not, and a site that invents an experiment is doing something worse than a site that admits it has none.

What is on the site, and where to start

The index of casinos is the backbone of the site, and it lists every brand we could establish accepts players from Canada, including the ones we were not willing to link, and the pages on the dollar and on payments carry the subject the site is named for; the live dealer section is the part this site has taken most trouble over.

The reason is that the "house edge" (the share of every stake the rules keep) at a live table is fixed by the rules of the game and is therefore the one part of a casino catalogue you can calculate in advance. Readers who connect from Ontario or from Alberta are taken to the page written for their province, which lists only the operators registered there and carries no offers at all.

The reason is that the advertising standards in both provinces reach "affiliate" (a site paid for the referral, which is what this one is) links directly (the Ontario bulletin names them). Readers in Québec and the rest of the country see the full site, in English or in French. The French section is not a "translation"!

It is the same material written for a reader in French, because a third of the trackers in our catalogue serve francophone Canada with a page of their own (thirty-two of them, at the last count). And because a reader in Québec is reading his own law rather than a summary of somebody else's.

Who we are

This site is published by [OWNER: ragione sociale, indirizzo, paese]. Correspondence reaches us at [OWNER: indirizzo di posta elettronica], and the contact page says what we can and cannot help with (an account is the operator's, not ours): this site is not a casino, this site has no access to anybody's gaming account, and a dispute with an operator runs through that operator's regulator rather than through us.

What we would most like to receive is a correction, and a licence number that has changed, a "register" entry this site has read wrongly, a payment method an operator has withdrawn: all of those are things a reader is likely to notice before we do. A page that invites the correction is more useful than a page that waits for it.

By the Canadian Dollar Casinos editorial team · Last updated October 2026 · Online since 2012